More Findings.
More Compensable Injuries.
Higher Payouts.
As many injury findings
MassMeds found 185 injuries compared with 83 in the firm's human review.
Primary-record findings
MassMeds tied 98 findings to primary evidence—pathology and biopsy reports—where the firm's human review recorded 54.
Earlier diagnosis dates
MassMeds located 27 earlier diagnosis dates against 11 that came later in the matched injuries.
Side by side
MassMeds found more evidence to review.
One pass through the supplied records produced the following findings. Additional findings are opportunities for verification—not automatically confirmed qualifying injuries.
| Comparison measure | Human review | MassMeds |
|---|---|---|
| Reported injury findings | 83 | 185 |
| Findings with diagnosis dates | 78 | 136 |
| Dated findings from primary records | 54 | 98 |
| Dated findings from secondary records | 24 | 38 |
Source: the workup firm's supplied medical-review comparison report, pp. 2–3 and 5. Primary records include pathology or biopsy reports; secondary records include treatment documentation.
More injury findings
2.2× as many findings.
MassMeds found 185 injury findings in the same records where the firm's human reviewers recorded 83 — more than twice as many potential compensable injuries surfaced for the docket.
More dated evidence
136 dated findings vs 78.
MassMeds tied 136 findings to diagnosis dates, compared with 78 in the human review — including 98 dated findings from primary records against the human reviewers' 54.
20 record sets. No charge.
Compare MassMeds with work your team has already reviewed.
Open a free account and run 20 of your reviewed records. Let us find additional diseases.